Teigen v. Occident Elevator Co.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Statement.
Bronson, Ch. J.
This is an action for the conversion of about 115 bushels of spring wheat. Plaintiff received a verdict in his favor. Defendant has appealed from an order denying judgment non obstante or in the alternative for a new trial. Defendant is a corporation engaged in the business of purchasing and storing grain. On December 10th, 1917, one Shong, a cropper, farming certain land in Ward County, gave to plaintiff a chattel mortgage to secure a note for $1910.00 dated. November 1st, 1917, and due November 1st, 1918. This mortgage, in addition to mortgaging certain farm…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Erickson v. WiperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
- Harney v. WirtzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- Willey v. SnyderMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Muir v. BlakeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Commonwealth Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. EllisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Maercklein v. MaerckleinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
- Barnard State Bank v. LankfordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
- Dinneen v. Farmers' Co-Operative Elevator Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
- Teigen v. Minnekota Elevatop Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1924