Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Kuhfahl v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 6, 1999No. 3A01-9805-CR-185Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partKirsch, Judge
I fully concur in the decision of the majority that the evidence was sufficient to revoke probation and that the trial court properly denied credit time for pre-trial home detention. From the decision that the trial court properly denied credit time for time spent on work release as a condition of probation, however, I respectfully dissent for the reasons set forth in Purcell v. State, 700 N.E.2d 815 (Ind.Ct.App.1998).
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Purcell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998