Legal Opinion
Boland v. Fortis Construction Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 12, 2011No. Civil Action 10-1701 (BAH)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
Trustees of the Bricklayers and Trowel Trades International Pension Fund (hereinafter “IPF”) 1 filed this case against defendant Fortis Construction Company, LLC (hereinafter “Fortis”), seeking to collect employer withdrawal liability pursuant to the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendment Act (hereinafter “MPPAA”) and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (hereinafter “ERISA”). Defendant Fortis has moved to dismiss the Complaint on grounds that the Court lacks both subject matter and personal jurisdiction, and is the improper venue…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- American Nat. Ins. Co. v. FDICCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wyandotte Nation v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Dugdale v. U.S. Customs & Border ProtectionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Morton v. BolyardDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Calobrisi v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- National Shopmen Pension Fund v. Stamford Iron & Steel Works, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.