Legal Opinion

Cockfield v. City of Fargo

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 2019No. 20180336PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jensen, Justice.

[¶1] Aaron Cockfield appeals from a judgment dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus seeking to compel the City of Fargo to reinstate Cockfield as an employee. Cockfield argues the district court erred in deciding the City did not violate his constitutional due process rights when it terminated his employment. We affirm.

I

[¶2] Cockfield was employed by the City's Solid Waste Department. On July 28, 2017, Cockfield was asked to perform a specific task within the scope of his employment. Cockfield refused to perform the requested work. Cockfield's acting route supervisor,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Yolanda Fuentes Riggins v. Board of Regents of the University of Nebraska, a Public Body Corporate John Dzerk, in His Official CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Matter of HehnNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Matter of Hogen Trust BNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Cockfield v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  4. ND Indoor RV Park v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API