Legal Opinion

Chesapeake Stone Co. v. Holbrook

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 27, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Carter Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Coubt by

Judge Cabboll

— Affirming.

The appellant, Chesapeake Stone Company, was engaged in operating a stone quarry, and in the conduct of its work it used charges of dynamite, fired by caps and fuse. The appellee, Holbrook, while engaged at work as a day laborer for the company in its quarry, was permanently and seriously injured by the explosion of a stick of dynamite left in a rock at the place where he was working by other servants of the company who had charge of the blasting in its quarry.

It appears that a few days before appellee received the injuries complained of, eight…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mather v. RillstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Jobe v. Spokane Gas & Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. PadgettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  2. Sanders v. SandersCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Standard Oil Co. of New Jersey v. NevilleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1931
  4. Tigrett v. PointerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Tigrett v. PointerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API