Clark v. Superior Lloyds of America
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
The record herein shows conclusively that defendant in error insured a "pickup" automobile, as distinguished from an "ambulance". Plaintiffs in error knew the distinction and recognized that an "ambulance" is a more hazardous risk than a "pick-up", and carries a higher rate of insurance. The insurance policy expressly excludes any obligation of the insurer, "(a) * * * while the automobile is used * * * as a public or livery conveyance or for carrying persons for a consideration, * * * unless such use is specifically declared and described in this policy and a premium charged therefor; * * *."…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Sonoco Products Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Trinity Universal Ins. Co. v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1947
- General American Cas. Co. v. Hill & Hill Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- Sonoco Products Company v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963