Sohl v. Geisendorf
Indiana Superior Court
1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.
This is an- application for an injunction, enjoining the defendants from using a trade mark, which plaintiffs-claim belongs to them.
It appears from the affidavits filed, that in 1859 James L. & Walter N. Evans were partners and millers at Noblesville, and employed one Roberts, of New York city, to get them.) up a brand or trade mark with which to mark a certain grade of flour which they manufactured. Roberts got up one, some of the distinctive features of which were the words, “ White Rose Mills,” “ Snowflake,” a double row, and the Word “ Family ” — -and perhaps “ Flour ” — -which the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clark v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1857
- Partridge v. MenckNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
- Coats v. Holbrook, Nelson & Co.New York Court of Chancery · 1845
3Cited by1 opinion
- Jones v. PercivalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1827