Legal Opinion

Sohl v. Geisendorf

Indiana Superior Court

Decided July 1, 1871PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRand, J.

This is an- application for an injunction, enjoining the defendants from using a trade mark, which plaintiffs-claim belongs to them.

It appears from the affidavits filed, that in 1859 James L. & Walter N. Evans were partners and millers at Noblesville, and employed one Roberts, of New York city, to get them.) up a brand or trade mark with which to mark a certain grade of flour which they manufactured. Roberts got up one, some of the distinctive features of which were the words, “ White Rose Mills,” “ Snowflake,” a double row, and the Word “ Family ” — -and perhaps “ Flour ” — -which the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Clark v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Partridge v. MenckNew York Court of Chancery · 1847
  3. Coats v. Holbrook, Nelson & Co.New York Court of Chancery · 1845

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. PercivalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1827

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API