Legal Opinion

Garcia v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 9, 1957No. 16348PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

m • • . , - , Claiming that a sentence of two years to run consecutively with a sentence defendant was serving was, because of the provisions of Section 3568, Title 18 U.S. D., beyond the power of the court to impose, appellant filed a motion, pursuant to Section 2255, Title 28 U.S.C., to vacate an<^ se^ it aside.

m7 ,. , . , . . The district judge, m an unreported . . . . , . opinion giving the correct reasons for his ,. , .®. . , _ , actl0n and Cltmg m suPPort Dockery v. Hiatt, 5 Cir., 197 F.2d 333 and Hiatt v. Ellis, 5 Cir 192 F.2d 119 denied his mo-tion, and this appeal followed,

For the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hiatt v. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  2. Dockery v. HiattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Vicente Garcia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API