Legal Opinion

Boeff v. Rosenthal

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided March 15, 1902Published

Appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon the verdict of a jury, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtDelehanty, J.

Defendant being the owner of certain real estate in this city conveyed the same to the firm of Klein & Friedman, a purchase-money mortgage being executed for a part of the consideration price thereof. Thereupon defendant procured for his grantees a building loan to aid them in the erection of *853certain buildings on said property, secured by bond and mortgage on the premises in question, and it is conceded that defendant was a part owner of that mortgage. It was then that the plaintiffs agreed with Klein & Friedman to furnish certain material to be used in the construction of said buildings,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mallory v. . GillettNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Ackley v. . ParmenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. W. T. Merserau Co. v. WashburnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API