Legal Opinion

State v. Tucker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 11, 1933No. 30,892PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

W. S. Tucker, a former county clerk, was found guilty of embezzlement of funds which came into his hands as such officer. He has appealed and contends that the court erred: (1) In overruling his plea in abatement and motion to quash, and (2) his motion to set aside or correct a journal entry pertaining to the first trial; (3) in denying his plea in bar, and (4) his challenge of a. certain juror for cause.

The question presented on the plea in abatement and motion to-quash arises in this way: A complaint was filed before the justice-of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Stabile v. . Warden, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. State v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. State v. PrattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  2. State v. PaxtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1968
  3. State v. SpringerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Bailey v. McLeodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API