Legal Opinion

Baltimore American Insurance v. Zimmerman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 5, 1930No. 29,417PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

In this action defendant Carl Millheisler, on a cross petition, seeks to recover damages from his codefendant, C. C. Zimmerman, for fraud practiced by Zimmerman in selling to Millheisler an interest in a real estate and insurance business in El Dorado. Judgment was rendered in favor of Zimmerman against Millheisler for $690.97 on a cross petition filed by Zimmerman against Millheisler. Millheisler appeals.

This is the second appearance of this action in this court. (Baltimore American Ins. Co. v. Zimmerman, 127 Kan. 145, 509, 274 Pac. 255.)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baltimore American Insurance v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  2. Baltimore American Insurance v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davidson v. McKownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  2. Lindsay v. KeimigSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API