Legal Opinion

Capital Asset Research Corp. v. Roger Finnegan

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 30, 2000No. 99-12932Published

1Per curiam

Capital Asset Research Corporation (“Capital Asset”) brought suit against Roger Finnegan and Breen Capital Holdings, Inc. The instant appeal is brought by Capital Asset, challenging the district court’s award of attorneys’ fees to Finnegan. Capital Asset makes two primary arguments on appeal: (1) that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to award attorneys’ fees to Finnegan; and (2) that any such award should have been denied in any event because Finnegan’s motion for attorneys’ fees was untimely.

BACKGROUND

The background facts and proceedings relevant to the above-mentioned…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Iranian Students Association v. Edwin EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. Antonio Paliaga v. Luckenbach Steamship Company, and Third-Party v. Turner & Blanchard, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. Sheldon Engel v. Teleprompter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. William Taylor v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Leo Callahan, Etc., Donald R. Hall, Etc., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API