Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Flora Woodworth

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 24, 1940No. 32,415PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

The appeal is from the judgment of the district court affirming an order of the probate court of Olmsted county denying appellant’s motion to vacate the order of said probate court of September 29, 1938, allowing the final account of Horace Fishback, the former executor of the estate of Flora Woodworth, filed and presented by the representatives of the estate of said Horace Fish-back, deceased.

The short facts which control the decision of the appeal may be thus stated: In 1925 Flora Woodworth died testate, a resident of Eochester, this state. Horace Fishback was appointed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hass v. BillingsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. In Re Estate of SimonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  3. Butterfield v. FarnhamSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1872
  4. First Trust & Savings Bank v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. In Re Estate of JordanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lenhart v. Lenhart Wagon Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  2. In Re Estate of HenrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. Severson v. EngbarthSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
  4. Matter of Estate of WeberCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Stumer v. Hibbing General HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API