Legal Opinion

Denver Employees Retirement Plan v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

The motion court providently exercised its discretion by refusing to compel plaintiff to respond to an untimely document request for “All Documents Concerning investments by or for the benefit of [plaintiff], direct or indirect, in securities issued by Lehman” (see Kingsgate Assoc. v Advest, Inc., 208 AD2d 356, 357 [1994]). The circumstances presented herein do not warrant exercise of our own independent discretion to reverse this order.

Likewise, we find no reason to disturb the exercise of the court’s “broad discretion” in denying defendant’s deposition notice (see Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of Fulton Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Brooklyn Union Gas Co. v. American Home Assurance Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Kingsgate Associates v. Advest, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API