Legal Opinion

Brimmeier v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 19, 2016No. 257 M.D. 2016PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JUDGE COVEY

The Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission (Commission) filed preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer and motion to strike to Joseph George Brimmeier, Ill’s (Brimmeier) Complaint setting forth causes of action in mandamus, declaratory judgment, breach of contract, promissory estoppel and misrepresentation (Com plaint) filed in this Court’s original jurisdiction. The sole issue before the Court is whether the Complaint states a claim upon which relief may be granted. After review, we sustain the Commission’s preliminary objections and dismiss Brimmeier’s Complaint.

This…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Martin v. Franklin Capital Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Halo Electronics, Inc. v. Pulse Electronics, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Gibbs v. ErnstSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Bortz v. NoonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. M. Mazur v. J. CuthbertCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  2. COHN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
  3. D. Hommrich v. PA Public Utilities CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. K.M. Kaplafka Jr. v. PSPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. L. Kingsley v. PPL Electric Utilities and PA PUCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API