Legal Opinion

Thurston v. Lubrite Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 9, 1926No. 26,400PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff sued to recover damages for breach of a contract of employment. Judgment was rendered in his favor,, and the defendant appeals.

The petition alleged verbal negotiations for the employment, a long distance telephone conversation concerning it, and a letter written by the vice president of the company in confirmation of that conversation. The vice president conducted all of the negotiations for the employment. The material part of the letter read as follows:

“In confirmation of telephone of even date, we are very pleased to have…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kaul v. American Independent Telephone Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  2. Heskett v. Border Queen Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  3. Evans v. N. B. McElfreshSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Handrub v. GriffinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Davenport Ladder Co. v. Edward Hines Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  3. J. I. Case Threshing Mach. Co. v. Buick Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. Schroyer v. RuffheadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Robben v. Farmers Coöperative Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API