Legal Opinion

Clark v. Matlock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 26, 1934No. 4-3612PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

The appellee brought suit against the appellants and alleged that Grady Russell, appellee’s intestate, before his death rented land from the appellants, and alleged that the fence inclosing the land rented was bad, and that the- crop was destroyed by cattle.

Before the suit was brought, Grady Russell died, and W. T. Matlock was appointed administrator of the estate. The suit was for $100 damages. There was a jury trial and verdict and judgment for $70. To reverse this judgment, this appeal is prosecuted.

There is no dispute about appellee’s intestate having rented the land, and no dispute about…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rundell v. RogersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wyatt v. ErnySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API