Yepa v. State Taxation & Revenue Department
New Mexico Court of Appeals
1DissentVigil, Chief J.
{38} It might seem odd to ask whether a mandatory sentence following a criminal conviction constitutes punishment. However, I respectfully submit that is the very question which this case presents. Considered in its proper light, Yepa is being subjected to an unconstitutional ex post facto law, and contrary to the holding of the majority, I would affirm.2
{39} The United States Constitution prohibits both the federal and state governments from enacting ex post facto laws. U.S. Const. art. 1, § 10, cl. 3 (prohibiting Congress from passing any ex post facto law); U.S. Const. art 1, § 10, cl. 1…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. OrdunezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.