Legal Opinion

State v. Boatman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1942No. 31455PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.

This, is a proceeding- by the county attorney for Douglas county, brought to this court with its consent, for a review of the record and to secure a reversal of the judgment of the district court.

The record discloses that on July 2,-1941, the county attorney for Douglas county filed an information in the district court, charging Harry Boatman, Henry Ploss and James Dugdale as employees of the county clerk for Douglas county with embezzling public money in the sum of $6,134. Defendant Dugdale moved for a separate trial and a separate trial was ordered. On January 6, 1942, defendants Boatman…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Lacey v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Moore v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. State v. HarringtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  5. United States v. BloomgartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1868

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Todd v. County of Box ButteNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Commonwealth v. BurnsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. In Re Thompson's EstateNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Hoffman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1957

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API