Ercanbrack v. Faris
Idaho Supreme Court
APPEAL from District Conrt of Ada County. Honorable George H. Stewart, Judge. Judgment for plaintiff, from which defendants appeal. cite no authorities in their brief upon the point decided. cite no authorities not found in the opinion on petition for rehearing.
1Opinion
ON PETITION POR REHEARING.
AILSHIE, J. —
The respondents have filed their petition for a rehearing in this case, in which they urgently insist that the court has not given that clause of the .contract discussed in the original opinion a proper interpretation and construction. The question most seriously urged is that the meaning given to the words “hereafter accruing” is not approved by the leading and recognized lexicographers, nor has it received judicial sanction where the same has come under the consideration of the courts. The sentence which has caused so much discussion and controversy in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Richards v. Bellingham Bay Land Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1893
- Emerson v. SteamboatWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860
- Gross v. PartenheimerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Strasser v. StaatsNew York Supreme Court · 1891