Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 8, 1999No. S98A1672PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Justice.

We granted a discretionary appeal in this case to consider whether the trial court erred in holding that a second action for modification of alimony filed by the appellee, Dr. Joe Wilson, was not subject to the two-year bar of OCGA § 19-6-19 (a). Because the first modification action, which Dr. Wilson voluntarily dismissed, resulted in significant litigation and in the entry of a temporary, but binding, order lowering his alimony obligation, we conclude that the second modification petition is barred by § 19-6-19 (a). Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s judgment.

Dr.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Georgia Mental Health Institute v. BradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
  2. Page v. Holiday Inns, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  3. Hendrix v. StoneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
  4. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
  5. Griffin v. GriffinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Spurlock v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  2. Bagwell v. BagwellSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  3. Le v. SherbondySupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  4. Le v. SherbondySupreme Court of Georgia · 2017
  5. Spurlock v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API