Legal Opinion

Gordon Metal Co. v. Kingan & Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 16, 1922PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Law and Equity Court of the city of Richmond in an action of unlawful detainer. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtPrentis, J.

This is an action of unlawful detainer, wherein the Gor*231don Metal Company was plaintiff, and Kingan and Co., Ltd., and the Southern Railway Company were the defendants. There was a verdict and judgment in favor of the defendants.

The facts are, that by agreement under seal, dated July 1, 1891, the Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, hereinafter called, the C. & 0., granted to Kingan & Co., Ltd., hereinafter called Kingan, the right to construct or cause to be constructed, a railroad track across the basin (or upper dock) of the C. & 0., in the city of Richmond, beginning on the line of.…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Northwestern Public Service Co. v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Terry v. TinsleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1924
  3. Strickland v. BarnesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
  4. Harris v. ScottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  5. Schultz v. CarterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API