Legal Opinion
Mentink v. World Time Corp. of America
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided June 7, 1990No. 89-6498-CIVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
RYSKAMP, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
THIS MATTER is before the court on the motion of defendant World Time Corporation (“World Time”) to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rule 17 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, filed August 25, 1989;1 and, in the alternative, its motion for a more definite statement.
Plaintiff Johannes Mentink (“Mentink”), as receiver for International Watch Suppliers (“IWS”), has sued World Time for breach of contract and conversion of IWS funds. World Wide moves to dismiss the complaint,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Somportex Limited v. Philadelphia Chewing Gum Corporation v. Brewster, Leeds & Co., Inc. And M. S. International, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- Great Western Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Robinson v. First Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
3Cited by3 opinions
- BCCI Holdings (Luxembourg), Societe Anonyme v. KhalilDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1997
- Alejandro Vivanco Alarcon as of the Estate of Araceli Alarcon Velazquez, Marie Eugenie Alarcon Velazquez, and Robert Blaauw as Receiver for Zalinco Corporation, N v. and Ocana Corporation, N v. v. Gabriel Alarcon Velazquez, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2018
- Donna B. Welch v. Atlas Turner, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2025