Arensmeyer, Warnock, Zarndt, Inc. v. Wray
New York Supreme Court
Application for an order awarding a contract to lowest bidder.
1Opinion of the CourtRodenbeck, J.
The contract involved on this application should be awarded to Arensmeyer, Warnock, Zarndt, Inc., under the second bidding. In advertising for bids the board was laboring under two misapprehensions. In its first advertisement it assumed that it had the right by a provision in the notice to award the contract to any bidder according to its judgment. This provision was omitted from the notice for bids upon readvertisement but the second notice contains a provision that the board reserves the right in its discretion to reject all bids as the interest of the city may appear. The board is not at…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Coughlin v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Molloy v. . City of New RochelleNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- People ex rel. Lynch v. LennonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- People ex rel. George E. Mathews & Co. v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ross v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Brown v. State, Department of Manpower AffairsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- Caruci v. DulanNew York Supreme Court · 1964
- Litemore Electric Co. v. KaweckiNew York Supreme Court · 1965