Legal Opinion

Harris v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 30, 2019No. 2298/17Published

1Opinion of the Court

Lloyd Harris v. State of Maryland, No. 2298, September Term, 2017. Submitted on Brief: February 14, 2019. Opinion by Battaglia, J. CRIMINAL LAW – RIGHT OF ACCUSED OF COMPULSORY PROCESS – RELEVANCY OF ALTERNATIVE SUSPECT EVIDENCE Trial judge properly exercised discretion in excluding from evidence material in which appellant proffered to insinuate that another individual had committed the crime for which he had been charged, including evidence of that individual’s criminal conviction which consisted of similar underlying acts that occurred in the same area and around the same time of the acts…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API