Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marriage of Roel v. Roel

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 9, 1987No. C5-86-1934Published

1DissentLansing, Judge

I concur in the majority’s holding that the trial court properly awarded Mary Ann Roel a portion of Tom Roel’s non-marital property because, without that property, she would suffer unfair hardship. I cannot, however, agree that any part of the contract-for-deed payments that Tom Roel receives from the sale of his parents’ property is marital.

Tom Roel’s interest in this property arose from two transactions: a gift from his mother to each of her three children individually, and a later sale to them of her life estate interest. The gift is indisputably nonmarital property. The life estate…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Marriage of Kottke v. KottkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Marriage of Larson v. LarsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API