Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Refinishing Systems

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided May 20, 2025No. 2:24-cv-00230Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS AMARILLO DIVISION DANIEL BARNETT, § § Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, § § v. § 2:24-CV-230-Z-BR § REFINISHING SYSTEMS and § MATTHEW C. ARMSTRONG, § § Defendants/Counter-Claimants. § FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND Plaintiff Daniel Barnett’s Motion to Remand And Brief In Support, (ECF 8), was referred to the undersigned for findings, conclusions, and recommendations. (ECF 22). Having considered the briefing, appendices, and relevant law, it is the recommendation of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Paul W. Douglass v. United Services Automobile AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Gunn v. MintonSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Manguno v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API