Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. Heifner
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
During the year 1912 appellant company issued its benefit certificate for $3,000 to W. O. Budder, of Harleton, Texas, in which the wife of the insured (now Mrs. Heifner) was named as beneficiary. In this application, Budder stated his occupation to be that of “station agent.” ■
In June and July, 1918, Rudder permitted the policy to lapse for the nonpayment of dues for those months, and during the month of July he made application for reinstatement, in which he gave Ms occupation as that of brakeman. Upon receipt of this application, .the secretary of the appellant company wrote a letter to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sovereign Camp Woodmen of the World v. NewsomSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
- United Order of Good Samaritans v. MeekinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Grand Lodge Ancient Order of United Workmen v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance v. Meyers Stave & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Sovereign Camp Woodmen of World v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Springfield Mutual Association v. AtnipSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Home Life & Accident Co. v. ScheuerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Sovereign Camp, Woodmen of the World v. MaysSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938