City of Chicago v. Hopson
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE STAMOS
delivered the opinion of the court:
After a bench trial, defendant was convicted of violating a disorderly conduct ordinance of the City of Chicago * and was fined $100.00. On appeal defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the judgment.
The following is the verbatim report of all testimony in this cause:
“OFFICER COOL
called as a witness in the above entitled cause, having been first duly sworn, was examined and testified as follows:
DIRECT EXAMINATION
BY
MR. SHERARD:
Q. State your name, officer.
A. Officer Cool.
Q. Officer, on March 12, 1970, the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Chicago v. PerezIllinois Supreme Court · 1970
- City of Chicago v. MurrayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. John W.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
- City of Chicago v. BlakemoreAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
- People v. SlatonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974