Legal Opinion

Bray v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 24, 1920No. 5732PublishedCited by 2 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged by complaint and information with malicious mischief in that he tore down and removed a fence by cutting.

There are quite a number of questions presented for-revision properly preserved by exceptions in regard to testimony and also the refusal of the court to give special instructions requested. From the view taken of the case, however, we deem it unnecessary to discuss those matters seriatim.

The case was tried by the State on the theory that the allowed owner of the fence was the rightful or legal owner of the land upon which the fence was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arbuthnot v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  2. Johns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  3. Pate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1904
  4. Farmer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dr. Alvin I. Thomas, Cross-Appellant v. Eristus Sams, Individually and as Mayor of Prairie View, and City of Prairie View, Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  2. Morgan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API