Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Cooper

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 25, 1939No. 3644PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, Associate Justice.

Plaintiff and defendant, with their two children, occupy the same apartment. She seeks a limited divorce and incident thereto presents her motion for alimony pendente lite. She invokes the rule announced in Pedersen v. Pedersen decided by our Court of Appeals on August 14, 1939, App.D.C., 107 F.2d 227.

To apply the doctrine of the Pedersen case to the facts alleged in the instant case would be a misinterpretation of what the court there said. The Pedersen case does not depart from the established rule that to entitle a wife to a temporary allowance for maintenance she…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Pedersen v. PedersenCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kreuz v. KreuzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Lutz v. LutzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API