Legal Opinion

In Re Grossman

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1930No. Docket No. 1991PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCraig, Acting P. J.

At the time set for the trial of a criminal case pending in the municipal court of the city of Los Angeles, the petitioner, an attorney at law,, was inducted into the proceedings as associate counsel. An affidavit of bias and prejudice had theretofore been filed, and counsel for the defendant then requested that the case be transferred to another department of said court. After argument the affidavit was ordered stricken from the files, and the bailiff was directed to call the jurors from adjoining rooms. Following the ruling of the court denying a transfer, and while jurors were entering the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Middlebrook v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
  2. In Re ShortridgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1907
  3. Platnauer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Dodge v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Curran v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. McKenzieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Hawk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. People v. FusaroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. Bennett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Higginbotham v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API