Burkhart v. Hart
Oregon Supreme Court
From Multnomah: Alfred F. Sears, Jr., Judge. Action by T. T. Burkhart, an assignee after maturity of a promissory note, to recover from R. C. Hart the amount thereof. Judgment for defendant and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bean
This action was commenced October 3,1896, to recover on a promissory note for $100, executed by the defendant, and made payable to the order of the Title Guarantee & Trust Company, one year after date, and assigned to the plaintiff after maturity. The complaint is in the usual form. The answer alleges that at the time the note was made the defendant was the owner of a lot in the City of Portland, fronting on what would be Yamhill Street if extended, and that the trust company was the owner of property immediately in front thereof, within the boundaries of such street; that the defendant and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Walker v. ClaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1852
- Pratt v. Gulick & ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1852
- McRaven v. CrislerMississippi Supreme Court · 1876
- Hawley & Dodd v. BinghamOregon Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sutherlin v. BloomerOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- Cameron v. Edgemont Investment Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1935
- First National Bank v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1929
- Hodson-Feenaughty Co. v. Coast Culvert & Flume Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Taylor v. TrippOregon Supreme Court · 1920
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.