Legal Opinion

Amazon.com Inc., et al. v. Michael Bartley, et al.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 30, 2026No. 2:24-cv-01188Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 7 AMAZON.COM INC., et al., CASE NO. C24-1188-KKE 8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR 9 v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT 10 MICHAEL BARTLEY, et al., 11 Defendant(s). 12 Plaintiff The Ergo Baby Carrier, Inc. (“Ergo”) created and designed babywearing carriers 13 that are sold by more than 700 retailers in the United States and more than 50 other countries. Dkt. 14 No. 49 ¶ 3. Together with Plaintiffs Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Services LLC 15 (collectively “Amazon”), Ergo filed this action alleging that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Ebay Inc. v. Mercexchange, L. L. C.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Pepsico, Inc. v. California Security CansDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  4. Susan Cripps, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant v. Life Insurance Company of North America, Plaintiff-Cross-Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. In Re Balbir Singh Tuli, Debtor. Balbir Singh Tuli v. Republic of IraqCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API