Legal Opinion

State v. Marshall

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 3, 2010No. M2007-02718-SC-R11-COPublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · HolderJanice M. Holder, C.J.

in which CORNELIA A. CLARK, GARY R. WADE, WILLIAM C. KOCH, JR., and SHARON G. LEE, JJ., joined.

Three tenants of the Gallatin Housing Authority were indicted under the theft of services statute, Tenn.Code Ann. § 39-14-104, for failing to report to the housing authority earnings that would have increased their rent. On the tenants’ motion, the trial court dismissed the indictments, and the Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the dismissal. Applying the canon of statutory construction ejusdem gen-eris, we hold that the definition of services in section 39 — 11—106(a) (35) does not include…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Owens v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State v. FlemmingTennessee Supreme Court · 2000

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by72 opinions

  1. Neal Lovlace v. Timothy Kevin CopleyTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State of Tennessee v. Ledarren S. HawkinsTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State of Tennessee v. Glover P. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Clark D. Frazier v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State of Tennessee v. Glen HowardTennessee Supreme Court · 2016

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API