State v. Johnson
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentSweeney, J.
Since I am of the opinion that the “clear and convincing” standard must be satisfied in all subsequent recommitment hearings, I must dissent from the majority opinion in this case.
The hearing for transfer in the cause sub judice was conducted under R.C. 2945.40(F), which states in relevant part:
<<* * * jf thg court or prosecutor does request a hearing within the fifteen-day period [after notice of the impending transfer], the trial court shall hold a full hearing on the person’s commitment not more than thirty days after the hearing is requested * * *. At the conclusion of the hearing, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- In re BurtonOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. ShepardOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
- State v. BrutonOhio Court of Appeals · 1985