Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Johnson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 19, 1987No. 86-1431Published

1DissentSweeney, J.

Since I am of the opinion that the “clear and convincing” standard must be satisfied in all subsequent recommitment hearings, I must dissent from the majority opinion in this case.

The hearing for transfer in the cause sub judice was conducted under R.C. 2945.40(F), which states in relevant part:

<<* * * jf thg court or prosecutor does request a hearing within the fifteen-day period [after notice of the impending transfer], the trial court shall hold a full hearing on the person’s commitment not more than thirty days after the hearing is requested * * *. At the conclusion of the hearing, the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. In re BurtonOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State v. ShepardOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. BrutonOhio Court of Appeals · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API