Legal Opinion

Love v. Wilson

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1956No. Docket 2, Calendar 46,773PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Black, J..Plaintiff’s bill, filed in the Wayne circuit January 27, 1955, requests determination of respective interests in and decree for dissolution of D. M. Love Associates, a copartnership. The member partners according to the bill are plaintiff and defendants Ralph C. Wilson, Jr., and Teena K. Wilson. The defendant bank, as we shall presently rule, is a necessary party against whom the plaintiff al-' leges .no right .to substantial, distinguished from auxiliary, relief. A charge of fraud is placed by the bill against the defendant Ralph C. Wilson, Sr., but it is unnecessary to consider…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Austin v. Socony Vacuum Oil Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Terranova v. Cottrell Block Construction Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Baker v. Lansing CompanyMichigan Supreme Court · 1943

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Perin v. PeulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Darr v. BuckleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State v. Excel Management Services, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. L'HOMMEDIEU v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Ortiz v. Textron, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API