Legal Opinion

City of Laredo v. Garza

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided May 13, 2009No. 04-08-00504-CVPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.

The City of Laredo appeals the trial court’s judgment, which found that Juan Garza Jr.’s compensable injuries included L4-L5 and L5-S1 herniated discs, L5-S1 radiculopathy, and complex regional pain syndrome. The City argues that there is legally insufficient evidence that these injuries were caused by Garza’s on-the-job accident because no expert medical evidence of causation was presented at trial. In response, Garza argues that his own lay testimony is sufficient evidence of causation and that no expert testimony was needed. Because we hold that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Roark v. AllenTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Guevara v. FerrerTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Insurance Company of North America v. MyersTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Morales v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. STATE OFFICE OF RISK MANAGEMENT v. Adkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
  2. Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company v. Ashlee Elizabeth PaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
  3. Cerny v. Marathon Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Texas Department of Insurance, Workers' Compensation Division v. De Los Santos, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2014
  5. Turner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API