Legal Opinion

C. Q. Yee Hop v. Nakuina

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1923No. 1466PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

LINDSAY, J.

Complainant in the circuit court brought an action for the specific performance of a certain agreement in writing dated the 5th day of December, 1915, under which respondents gave unto one J. R. Wilson the exclusive right and option to purchase the land described therein, which option was assigned by the said Wilson to complainant. An alleged copy of the agreement which is sought to be specifically performed is attached to the bill of complaint and marked “Exhibit B”. It is alleged in the bill of complaint that, at or about the time of the execution of said…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ide v. LeiserMontana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Coleman v. ApplegarthCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1887
  3. Atlee v. BartholomewWisconsin Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Marsh v. LottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  5. Johnston v. TrippeU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Georgia · 1887

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Travelodge International, Inc. v. Continental Properties, Inc. (In Re Continental Properties, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 1981
  2. McLellan v. CharlyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
  3. In Re the Trustees Under the Will & of the Estate of DamonHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Ko Olina Development, LLC v. Centex HomesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Riihimaki v. KimUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Hawaii · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API