Legal Opinion

Doreo v. Doreo

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1950PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

Pursuant to the provisions of rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice defendants Ernest H. Osborne and the First National Bank of Poughkeepsie move for judgment on the pleadings striking out and dismissing the complaint.

The complaint alleges that in June, 1944, plaintiff and her husband agreed between themselves to purchase a certain parcel of improved real estate as a home for themselves and family; that pursuant to such agreement plaintiff advanced to her husband the sum of $1,000 representing accumulated savings of plaintiff which sum of $1,000 was used as a cash payment in the purchase of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hunt v. . HuntNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Newman v. DoreNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
  3. In Re Proving the Will of DaggettNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of MavromatisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API