Legal Opinion

Hillis v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 29, 1951No. 55389; protests 118510-K and 125691-K (Los Angeles)Published

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The merchandise involved in these suits consists of certain “pikake” shells which were assessed for duty under paragraph 1527 (a) (2), Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement with Mexico (T. D. 50797), at the compound rate of 55 per centum ad valorem as “jewelry.” Several claims are made in plaintiffs’ protests but the one chiefly relied upon is that the merchandise is properly free of duty under paragraph 1738 as “shells, not sawed, cut, flaked, polished, or otherwise manufactured, or advanced in value from the natural state.”

The pertinent provisions of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WanamakerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Protests 103339-K of Pacific National BankUnited States Customs Court · 1945
  3. Thomson Trading Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API