Legal Opinion

M. S. Fleishman & Co. v. Ver Does

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 10, 1900PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Sioux District Court. — Hon. George W. Wakefield, Judge. Action for balance due on account. Defense, settlement. Judgment for defendants. The nlaintiffs appeal.—

1Opinion of the CourtLadd, J.

1 The original indebtedness of one thousand two hundred and fifty-seven dollars and ninety-three cents is not disputed, and the evidence without conflict shows the execution of the ten notes of forty-five dollars each, secured by a mortgage covering the defendants’ homestead, and that, by agreement with plaintiffs’ agent, there was indorsed on their itemized account: “Received $450 in full settlement of above account. Feb. 15, 1897. M. S. Fleishman & Go.” The issue as to whether, as a part of this agreement, the defendants were to pay the balance of the account, notwithstanding this receipt,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. National Improvement & Construction Co. v. MaikenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Casady v. Manchester Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Perpetual Building & Loan Ass'n v. United States Fidelity & Guarantee Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  2. Dunton v. McCookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  3. Community Savings Bank v. GaughenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
  4. First National Bank of Marengo v. AtheySupreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  5. Russ v. HansenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API