Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Does

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 21, 2024No. 2:24-cv-00182Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 STEPHEN JOHN CLAYTON, et al., CASE NO. C24-0182JLR 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER v. 12 DOES, 13 Defendants. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is pro se Plaintiffs Stephen John Clayton and Christopher Stephen 17 Clayton’s (together, “Plaintiffs”) ex parte “motion for third party discovery.” (Mot. (Dkt. 18 # 5).) This is the second case Plaintiffs have filed in this court and the third time they 19 have moved for such relief. See generally Dkt., Clayton v. Does, No. C23-1324JLR 20 (W.D. Wash.)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Sanford v. MemberWorks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Ebeid Ex Rel. United States v. LungwitzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API