Legal Opinion
People v. Simonds
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 23, 1989PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. Defendant’s argument with respect to an alleged Rosario (People v Rosario, 9 NY2d 286) violation, never having been raised in the trial court or the Appellate Division, is unpreserved for our review (People v Poole, 48 NY2d 144, 149-150), and his other arguments are without merit.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. PooleNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. HentleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. RashidAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. BaezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. DelgadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. DavisNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.