Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

James v. Medford

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 22, 1974No. 74-83PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARLETON HARRIS, Chief Justice.

Appellants, Charles H. James and Carolyn B. James, his wife, and John L. Ham-maker and Billie Hammaker, his wife, instituted suit against appellees, M. C. Medford and Bertha Medford, his wife, James A. Medford and Donna Jean Medford, his wife, and Harper Realty Company, seeking specific performance of a contract for the sale of real property, or in the alternative, damages. The contract provided for the purchase of 120 acres of land, more or less, for the sum of $28,750.00. The court refused to grant specific performance. The chief difficulties between the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dollar v. KnightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Fordyce Lumber Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  3. Morgan v. DownsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  4. Hirschman v. ForehandSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  5. Routen v. Walthour-Flake Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Apple v. CooperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. Knight v. DeaversSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. Sossamon v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  4. Stewart v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2001
  5. Fuller v. NorwoodCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API