Legal Opinion · Dissent

Landrum v. State

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided July 1, 1998No. CA CR 97-1090Published

1DissentAndree Layton Roaf, Judge

I would reverse this case and remand for transfer to juvenile court, because a circuit court’s decision to retain jurisdiction of criminal charges against a juvenile must be supported by clear and convincing evidence, and in this case, it most clearly was not. Arkansas Code Annotated section 9-27-318(f) states:

Upon a finding by clear and convincing evidence that a juvenile should be tried as an adult, the court shall enter an order to that effect.

We have defined clear and convincing evidence as:

evidence by a credible witness whose memory of the facts about which he testifies is distinct,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McClure v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. Puckett v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Leheny v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API