Legal Opinion
Perez v. Rodino
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 8, 2000PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Diane A. Lebedeff, J.
Before the court is an application for approval of annual *856commissions of the cotrustees of a supplemental needs trust (SNT), as well as a request for approval of disbursements by the attorney cotrustee. The commissions requested are in the modest amount of $78.75 for each cotrustee. The disbursements for which approval is requested total $172.85, comprised of duplicating, postage, facsimile transmission, and local transportation expenses. Given that the SNT provides that commissions are to be fixed under SCPA 2309, the attorney co-trustee has asked…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cricchio v. PennisiNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
- MTR. OF STORTECKY v. MazzoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re the Estate of GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- In re the Estate of StalbeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1985
- In re GoldblattNew York Surrogate's Court · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re KennyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Estate of MinkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re GreensteinNew York Supreme Court · 2003
- In re the Estate of WoolworthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010