Legal Opinion

City of Kingman v. Jones

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 5, 1909No. 16,333Published

' Appeal from Kingman district court; Preston B. Gillett, judge.

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment in the district court finding the defendant guilty of the violation of a city ordinance.

It appears from the abstract that the appeal was not properly perfected. Service of the notice of appeal was made and acknowledged February 3, 1908, and a transcript, with important requirements omitted, was filed in this court February 3, 1909. Section 284 of the criminal code requires that the transcript shall be filed within thirty days after the appeal is taken. (The State v. McEwen, 12 Kan. 37, 38; The State v. Furney, 40 Kan. 17.)

However, we have examined into the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. McEwenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. State v. FurneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API