Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Baugh

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 28, 1936No. 8162PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUM, District Judge.

Appellee, as plaintiff below, sued under the Texas Workmen’s Compensation Act (Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St.Tex. art. 8306 et seq.) to recover for alleged total and permanent disability resulting from an industrial injury.

On December 15, 1934, Baugh was shoveling dirt out of a ditch about three feet wide at the bottom and seven feet deep, when the side of the ditch caved in while Baugh was leaning over in a stooped position, covering him up to the waist, or a little above, with rough gravel and wet dirt. When the dirt struck Baugh, he noticed a shortness of breath, a severe pain…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Insurance Co. v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. United States v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. St. Clair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Crumpton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railroad v. NewellIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Meaney v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. Morgan v. Sun Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
  3. Krug v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  4. Parsons v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  5. Stanley B. Hall v. Texas & New Orleans Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API