Indian Lumber Co. v. Roux

This is the third appearance of this case here. See Indian Lumber Company, et al., v. Roux, 106 Fla. 77, 154 Sou 142, and Roux v. Indian River Lumber Company, et al., 119 Fla. 280, 161 Sou. 270. In disposing of the cause on its first appearance we said, in part:

“The quoted fourth plea by the defendants, Milam and Drake, in substance avers that the original obligation of which the note sued on is a partial renewal, was the obligation of the Indian Lumber Company and was endorsed by the plaintiff and by Kelly and Hanbury; that .neither Milam nor Drake was an endorser’on.said original…